Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove refs to split_midis_for_training in doc #205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

Remove refs to split_midis_for_training in doc #205

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

Zaka
Copy link
Contributor

@Zaka Zaka commented Nov 13, 2024

Instead, put split_files_for_training


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://miditok--205.org.readthedocs.build/en/205/

Instead, put split_files_for_training
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.14%. Comparing base (9d9781c) to head (af5f65d).
Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #205      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.65%   90.14%   -0.51%     
==========================================
  Files          40       41       +1     
  Lines        6011     6594     +583     
==========================================
+ Hits         5449     5944     +495     
- Misses        562      650      +88     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@Natooz Natooz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the fix, and apologies for the inconvenience this error caused:)

@Natooz Natooz merged commit 76bc990 into Natooz:main Nov 13, 2024
21 checks passed
@Zaka Zaka deleted the doc-remove-ref-to-split_midis_for_training branch November 14, 2024 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants